The seven-point checklist
The label and destination describe the same product type.
The useful angles match the category, not just a flattering front view.
Generic sizing language is not a substitute for product-specific context.
The comparison uses like-for-like rows and does not treat price as proof.
Item weight, packaging and volume are considered as estimates.
Useful fields carry the decision.
The reason names visible evidence and remaining uncertainty.
Manual checklist result
This quick checklist treats all seven checks equally. The interactive Orient Score uses transparent weights totaling 100 because photos, fit and source relevance can resolve more uncertainty than a single basic check. Read the scoring methodology before comparing weighted results.
Strong manual result
Continue, but recheck the current external details.
Research more
Name the missing evidence before another search.
Weak row
Keep it out unless a specific source can fill the gaps.
Remove for now
The row is creating noise rather than useful choice.
QC photos by category
| Category | Useful QC coverage | Common missing evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Shoes | Both sides, toe, heel, outsole, insole and size context | Profile shape or usable sizing |
| Hoodies & shirts | Front, back, seams, labels and garment measurements | Length, width or fabric context |
| Jackets | Exterior, lining, closures, cuffs and measurement points | Interior construction and packed volume |
| Pants & shorts | Front, back, waistband, rise and inseam | Actual waist or length information |
| Bags | All sides, interior, hardware, strap and scale | Dimensions or interior organization |
| Accessories | Close-ups, fastening, scale and included pieces | Size reference and finish detail |
Learn how to read measurements, angles, lighting and missing evidence in the full QC photos guide →
Good row example
A jacket row identifies the category, shows front and back views, includes chest and length measurements, displays the lining and closure, links to a matching current page, and notes that packed volume may affect shipping. The reason to save is clear: the evidence answers fit and construction questions well enough for a closer look.
Weak row example
A bag row uses a broad label, one front image and a link with no visible dimensions or interior view. The price looks attractive, but there is no fair comparison and no estimate of packaging weight. The row should not survive merely because the label is familiar.
What to do next
If the row scores well, open its current destination and recheck the options. If it scores in the middle, search for the missing measurement or view. If it scores poorly, remove it and compare fewer, stronger rows.